- presumptive therapy
- justification: early intervation = better outcome
Approach to empirical therapy
- get clinical dx
- specimen for lab exam
- formulate microbiologic dx
- is empirical therapy necessary?
- start treatment
- monitoring of treatment
Choice of antimicrobial agents
- host factor
- PMHx - liver, renal, AIDS
- drug allergy
- age
- pregnancy status
- pharmacokinetics
- delivery of drugs to site of action
- SE
- drug interaction
Interpretation of culture results
Reasons for -ve results
- wrong sample - give abx first, contaminated
- wrong request - bacterial vs viral culture
- non-cultivable organism/slow growing stuff - H. capsulatum, bartonella
- non knowing special needs of culture medium
- measures MIC - minimum drug concentration to INHIBIT organism growth
- or MBC - minimal bacteriocidal concentration
- usually MIC is measured
- only in severe cases where MBC is measured - meningitis, endocarditis, neutropaenic sepsis
Specialised assay methods
- B lactamase assay
- synergy studies
Monitoring therapeutic response - duration of therapy
- 2 methods
- microbiology - cultures/specimens should become sterile
- clinically - symptoms, inflammatory markers, radiology
- generally determined empirically
- serious infection: 7-10 days after pt is afebrile
- recurrent infections: longer
- check culture
- check host
- check abx
Bacteriostatic vs bacteriostatic activity
- generally, cell wall agents are bactericidal
- aminoglycosides
- B-lactams abx
- isoniazid
- metronidazole
- pyrazinamide
- quinolones
- rifampicin
- vancomycin
- chloramphenicol
- clindamycin
- ehtambutol
- macrolides
- nitrofurantoin
- oxazolidinones
- sulfonamides
- tetracyclines
- trimethoprim
- immunocompetent - doesnt matter it's the same
- immunocompromised - bactericidal
- severe infection like meningitis/endocarditis/neutropaenic - bactericidal
- concentration dependent killing - aminoglycosides, quinolones
- time dependent killing - B-lactams, vancomycin; bactericidal activity continues as long as serum concentration > MBC
- persistant suppression of bac growth after limited exposure
- reason:
- reversible non-lethal damage to cell structures --> needs time to recover
- drug still at binding site within periplasmic space
- then need to synthesize new enzymes before growth will resume
- many have similar pharmacokinetic properties po vs iv
- tetracycline
- trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
- quinolones
- chloramphenicol
- metronidazole
- clindamycin
- rifampicin
- fluconazole
- critically ill pt
- bacterial meningitis/endocarditis
- cannot swallow
- abx that are poorly absorbed orally
- usually able to switch
- some no alternatives - eg neurosyphilis has anaphylaxis to penicillin - needs desensatisation
- penicillin + cephalosporin <10%>
- penicillin + imipenem cross reaction - >50%
ANTIMICROBIAL DRUG COMBINATION
Rationale
- seriously ill
- polymicrobial infections - intra-abdominal abscess
- reduce resistance (eg TB)
- reduce dose-related toxicity with single agent
- enhanced inhibition/killing
Synergism and antagonism
- 2 drugs together - MIC/MBC using 1/4th of the dosage compared to using single agent
- see text how to calculate synergism and antagonism
- FIC (fractional inhibition concentration) index <=0.5 = synergism
- FIC index >=4 = antagonism
- Blockade of multiple steps in metabolic sequences - eg in bactrim as folic acid p/way - against PCP
- Inhibit enzymatic inactivation - amoxyl-clavulanic acid, timentin, tazocin
- Enhancement of antimicrobials uptake - cell wall agents (penicillin) increases aminoglycoside uptake by bacteria - eg Staph, enterococci, Pseudomonas, strep
- Inhibition of cidal agents by static agents - cell wall agents need dividing cells to act upon - if stopping cell division = cannot work; eg: tetracycline + chloramphenicol inhibit cell wall agents
- Induction of enzymatic inactivation - g-ve (enterobacter, pseudomonas, serratia, citrobacter) if given imipenem, cefoxitin, ampicillin - can induce B-lactamase secretion --> hence B-lactams will lose activity
Surgical vs non surgical
- Surgical - needs to cover common pathogen - typically cefazolin/cefalothin
- Non-surgical - for suspected exposure or immunocompromised - depends on situation
- clean
- infection rate <2%
- elective
- primarily closed procedure - respiratory, gastrointestinal, biliary, genitourinary, or
oropharyngeal tract not entered - no acute inflammation and no break in technique
- infection rate 10%
- emergency of an otherwise elective as above
- minimal spillage/minimal break
- Infection rate 20%
- Acute nonpurulent inflammation
- major technique break or major spill from hollow organ
- penetrating trauma <>
- chronic open wounds to be grafted or covered
- dirty
- Infection rate 40%
- Purulence or abscess present
- preoperative perforation of respiratory, gastrointestinal, biliary, or oropharyngeal tract
- penetrating trauma > 4 hrs old
No comments:
Post a Comment